一日たっても

もっと多く拡散して欲しいですねえ。

ノーベル物理学賞受賞者含む300人の学者が「気候変動の緊急事態など存在しない。科学の危険な腐敗だ」と宣言／「風力、太陽光は完全な失敗で環境を破壊しているだけだ」

2022年のノーベル物理学賞受賞者、「気候緊急事態」の物語を「科学の危険な腐敗」と非難

2022年のノーベル物理学賞の共同受賞者は、 「気候非常事態」の言説に対して痛烈な攻撃を開始し、これを「世界経済と何十億もの人々の幸福を脅かす危険な科学の腐敗」と呼んだ。ジョン・クラウザー博士は、誤った気候科学が「大規模な衝撃ジャーナリズムの疑似科学に転移した」と指摘している。

クラウザー博士は、亜原子および原子レベルでの物質と光の研究である量子力学の世界有数の権威の一人だ。2010 年には、ノーベル賞に次いで 2 番目に権威のある物理学賞とされるウルフ賞物理学賞を受賞した。

彼のコメントは、科学者の99％が気候変動のすべてまたはほとんどが人間によって引き起こされていると信じているという明白な誤りにさらなる疑問を投げかけるのに役立つだろう。

クラウザー氏は続けて、今度は、気候疑似科学が、無関係な他のさまざまな病気のスケープゴートになった、と続けた。「私の意見では、本当の気候危機など存在しない」と彼は付け加えた。

クラウザー博士は、気候変動に関する「決着した」科学的、政治的物語に異議を唱えた最初のノーベル物理学賞受賞者ではない。世界気候宣言には約300人の気候学者が署名しており、「気候緊急事態など存在しない」と宣言している。

筆頭署名者はノーベル賞受賞者のイーヴァル・ギアヴァー教授だ。気候モデルは「世界的な政策ツールとしては到底妥当性がない」と言われている。二酸化炭素などの温室効果ガスの影響を誇張しているが、有益な影響は無視していると宣言は述べている。気候科学は、健全な自己批判的な科学ではなく、信念に基づいた議論に変質している、と同誌は述べている。

アントニーノ・ジチキ教授は、イタリア最高位の勲章であるイタリア共和国功労勲章ナイト・グランド・クロスの保持者である。2019年、同氏はイタリアの科学教授48人からなるグループを率いて、気候変動に対する人間の責任は「不当に誇張されており、壊滅的な予測は現実的ではない」と述べた。彼らの科学的見解では、「1850 年以来観測されている地球温暖化のかなりの部分は自然変動で説明できる」としています。

昨年9月、著名な核物理学者ウォレス・マンハイマー博士は、ネット・ゼロは現代文明を終わらせると警告した。同氏は、新しい風力と太陽光のインフラは失敗し、数兆ドルの費用がかかり、環境の大部分を破壊し、「完全に不必要」になるだろうと観察した（dailysceptic）

下記が原文

Nobel Physics Laureate 2022 Slams ‘Climate Emergency’ Narrative as “Dangerous Corruption of Science”

BY CHRIS MORRISON 14 JULY 2023 7:00 AM

The co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize has launched an excoriating attack on the ‘climate emergency’ narrative, calling it a “dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people”. Dr. John Clauser notes that misguided climate science has “metastasised into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience”.

Dr. Clauser is one of the world’s leading authorities on quantum mechanics, the study of matter and light at a sub-atomic and atomic level. In 2010 he was awarded the Wolf Prize in Physics, considered the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel. His comments will help cast further doubt on the obvious falsehood that 99% of scientists believe humans cause all or most climate change. Physicists along with chemists play a dominant role in investigating the science surrounding climate, which at its core focuses on heat exchange and the behaviour of atmospheric gases.

In turn, continued Clauser, the climate pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies and environmentalists. “In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s largest population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science,” he added.

Dr. Clauser is not the first Nobel physics prize-winner to challenge the ‘settled’ scientific and political narrative of climate change. The World Climate Declaration has been signed by around 300 climate professors, and declares: “There is no climate emergency.” The lead signatory is the Nobel laureate Professor Ivar Giaever. Climate models are said to be “not remotely plausible as global policy tools”. They exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, but ignore any beneficial effect, the Declaration states. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science, it says.

Professor Antonino Zichichi is the holder of Italy’s highest merit order, the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic, awarded for a lifetime of distinguished scientific work including several discoveries in the field of sub-nuclear physics. In 2019 he led a group of 48 Italian science professors in stating that human responsibility for climate change is “unjustifiably exaggerated and catastrophic predictions are not realistic”. In their scientific view, “natural variation explains a substantial part of global warming observed since 1850”.

Recently, four Italian scientists, including three physics professors, undertook a major review of historical climate trends and concluded that declaring a ‘climate emergency’ is not supported by the data. Over many meteorological categories there was “no clear positive trend of extreme events”. Of course, cherry-picking single bad, or ‘extreme’, weather events provides the main fire power for convincing populations that a global and collectivist de-industrialisation must take place within less than 30 years. Last September, the leading nuclear physicist Dr. Wallace Manheimer warned that Net Zero would end modern civilisation. He observed that the new wind and solar infrastructure would fail, cost trillions, trash large portions of the environment “and be entirely unnecessary”. The ‘Climate Industrial Complex’ had “somehow” managed to convince many that CO2 in the atmosphere, a gas necessary for life on Earth that is exhaled in every breath, “is an environmental poison”, he added.

Dr. Clauser has recently been elected to the board of the Virginia-based CO2 Coalition, a group of around 120 scientists and researchers representing a broad range of climate science disciplines. Welcoming Clauser to the board, the distinguished atmospheric scientist Dr. William Happer, Emeritus Professor at Princeton, said his studies of climate provided strong evidence that there is no climate crisis and that increasing CO2 concentrations will benefit the world. Dr. Happer is a leading proponent of the ‘saturation’ hypothesis of warming gases such as CO2, observing that at certain levels such gases become saturated in small bands of the infrared spectrum. As a consequence, their warming ability diminishes on a logarithmic scale, an observation that helps explain the 600 million-year geological record, where CO2 measurements have been up to 20 times higher than current atmospheric levels.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.